Responses to e-jw

[Since this happens to be the first search result for Matt.24:5; I am going to post these links, here, though it may not be related to the post that follows below. (http://4womaninthewilderness.blogspot.com/2014/10/who-says-i-am-christ.html)
(http://4womaninthewilderness.blogspot.com/2012/08/i-have-finally-gotten-to-answer.html --Part B)]
-  -  -  -  -  -  -

For those of you who visit "e-jw.org";
you may be aware that I was challenged there, to defend the things I have supposedly taught.
The many scriptures I include in all my assertions are my defense, but I am happy to address the misconceptions being asserted there.
The problem is, I am now (since the challenge was posted) unable to log in at that website. I wonder if the "administrator" who challenged me,
knows that; as well as the "moderator" who agreed with him.
Neither of them have written me directly about these points,
nor asked for any specific explanations to be posted here.
Whatever cowardice is involved in my inability to respond to this challenge,
I hope that cowardice is assigned to the actual one who possesses it.
Deut.32:35; 2Tim.4:14; 2Pet.2:12; Jude1:10

About the reference to Mark3:25...

Let me post the context:

"24 And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. 25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand. 26 And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but he has an end."

So I ask...where here does it say that Satan's kingdom (house) is not going to be divided, or that it is going to "stand" and not end?

Do you think that the feet of Daniel's image is under God's domain, or Satan's?

We read concerning those feet:

Dan.2:41-43:

"41 Whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; yet the strength of the iron shall be in it, just as you saw the iron mixed with ceramic clay. 42 And as the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile. 43 As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay. "

Where do you get the idea that Satan's plans will not fall, due to his house not being divided?

In fact, Jesus said that every house not constructed on his teachings, will break apart and fall (Matt.7:26,27).
The fall of this Image, is associated with the end of Satan's world, and the beginning of God's eternal kingdom (Dan.2:34-45).

By the way, I do not teach that the GB is the disgusting thing. If you had really read my writings, you would be well aware that I teach this as an impossibility.
(pearl-disgustingthing.blogspot.com)

Oh, and I am not the only anointed one who sees our present spiritual situation with clarity.

Pearl Doxsey

-----------------------------------------------
Another response:

"Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says." (1Cor.14:34)

Which Law?

The Jewish Law! 

Heb.8:7,6 states:

(7) "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah (6) But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises."

Paul also said,

"I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet." (1Tim.2:12)
Who does not permit??? Is it God?

However, I am inclined to believe that Paul was referring to the Bible's meaning of "woman" covenants and those in them...
that these are to be silent before the Christ who teaches them (Matt.10:27; Eph.5:23,24) This is the meaning of the context of 1Tim.2:12 (1Tim.2:13,14,15; Gal.4:19; Rev.12:2; Eph.5:23,24,32) Being "kept safe through childbearing" (1Tim.2:15) is not physical, but spiritual. Also the submissive "wife" of which Paul speaks as having this spiritual protection, is not physical, but spiritual (Gal.4:19; Rev.12:2).
pearl-thewoman.blogspot.com
Do you know how many anointed ones fail in doing this,
by "speaking up" and teaching things that Christ has not given them? These usurp the headship and actual current teachings of Christ.
Paul was the watchdog of the first century, over this very "wife" (2Cor.11:2,3).
This is why he did not permit such inpropriety among the "Bride".

What about anointed woman...How do these compare with anointed men?

(This was later written by Paul)

28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.26 For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus."

Gal.3:28,29,26

"They are all SONS of God" "neither male nor female".

What about Paul's supposed rule about a woman covering their head?

How did the Christian Congregations deal with this Jewish rule? 

If you actually read what Paul said....

1Cor.11:15

"but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering"

Verse 16 reads,

"If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice--nor do the churches of God"

So...

no practice of wearing head coverings in "the churches of God" (New Covenant- 1Cor.14:33; Rev.1:11), nor the yielding to those who "contend" this point.

Why?

It was Paul who wrote Gal.3:28,29,26 as quoted above....

because within the body of Christ, they are all firstborn sons and as such, should not cover that glory. (1Cor.11:7; John17:22; Rom.8:30,18; 2Cor.3:18). The glory given the anointed firstborn "sons of God", shows no preference to physical gender, nor a distinction between male or female anointed (Gal.3:28,26).

The only distinction which God himself places between these "sons" of God,

is their assignment within the body of Christ...

1Cor.12:18,28,29

18 "But now God has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased. 28 And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles?"

Is any distinction made between male and female? Why would there be, if there is neither male nor female inside the body of Christ? If God assigns a son of God (who happens to have female flesh) as a prophet, because that is "just as He pleases",

who should take it upon themselves to say that this is wrong?

(Eze.33:20; Jer.31:22 --look up the Hebrew)

------------------------------------------------------
Another reply:

It has been said that a genuine anointed prophet would not disclose who they were.
To comply with that restriction, this would also prevent that one from disclosing the source of their message.
How many of the Bible's prophets did this?
Can a prophet declare that they have a message from God, and not declare that they are God's messenger?

What was Jesus Christ's example?
Although Jesus knew it was futile (we will discuss why this was the case in a moment)
he answered the Scribes and Pharisees when they asked him....
"Who are you?" they demanded. Jesus replied, "The one I have always claimed to be." (John8:25)
"Jesus answered, "My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me." (John7:16)
"For I did not speak on my own, but the Father who sent me commanded me to say all that I have spoken" (John12:49)
"Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.
”You are a king, then!" said Pilate. Jesus answered, "You say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me." (John18:36,37)

Why did Jesus not bother to identify himself to those who would not accept him?
We can know by looking at these verses:
"But what about you?" Jesus asked. "Who do you say I am?" Peter answered, "You are the Messiah."
Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood,
 but by my Father in heaven."  Matt.16:15,16,17

Jesus said that a wicked and adulterous generation keeps looking for a sign (Matt.12:39),
something to be viewed with eyes of flesh. They seem unable to see both the signs God is willing to give and the meaning of them. As we saw with the case of Peter, the recognition of a true prophet is determined by God's spirit. It is futile to attempt to convince those who are looking at the flesh (1Cor.2:12-15,10). This is why prophets are not accepted by those who know them well (Matt.13:57,58). The Jewish leaders had all kinds of senseless, fleshly excuses, for their rejection of Christ; even though, all the while, he fulfilled every prophecy God's Word indicated about his identity.

While Jesus trusted his Father to draw the humble to him...
"No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day."(John6:44)
But this did not stop Jesus or Holy Spirit from bearing witness for the sake of those not blind...

13 The Pharisees therefore said to Him, “You bear witness of Yourself; Your witness is not true.”
(This is the very same accusation against me.)
14 Jesus answered and said to them, “Even if I bear witness of Myself, My witness is true, for I know where I came from and where I am going; but you do not know where I come from and where I am going. 15 You judge according to the flesh; I judge no one. 18 I am One who bears witness of Myself, and the Father who sent Me bears witness of Me.” John8:13-15,18,49 
So then, did God want people to know who Jesus was?
(God chose who He revealed Christ to.)
Do you think God wants lovers of Truth to recognize His other sons?
"Eagles" will gather to the "carcass"...
And the time is coming, when Satan's agents will no longer be able to conceal them (Rom.8:19,18).

Try to imagine being given insight, visions, and revelations, into the final prophecies by Holy Spirit itself, which show you the calamity to come upon millions, and the responsibility that goes along with that.
Do you think God would approve if you hid the source of your message? (Matt.5:14,15,16; 25:25,30; 1John2:20,27)
Do you think you would have any hope of reaching the world with the truth, if your message and identity  blended in with the Billions of other people leaving their opinions on the internet? (1Cor.14:7,8; Joel2:1)
How would Jesus have accomplished his ministry, and been sacrificed as our ransom, if he never did anything to stand out as God's messenger? (Luke4:16,17,18,19,20,21)
If the people that proclaim that my message is false, because of my truthful statement about why I preach;
I ask them to please leave a comment here, about how they would proceed...
if they were in my shoes.
If your suggestion is based upon scripture,
I will heed it.